- From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:08:49 +0200
- To: Jakub Kotowski <jakubkotowski@gmx.net>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-cwm-talk@w3.org
i have no specific use case at the moment. i just try to understand which architecture is best suited for OWL2-RL. at the moment, my knowledge is limited to forward chaining engines. so i try to evaluate this option. but any comment is very welcome. On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Jakub Kotowski <jakubkotowski@gmx.net> wrote: > Dear Olivier, > > Olivier Rossel wrote: >> do you think that cwm's architecture is suitable as a rule engine for OWL2RL? > > I'm not an expert on cwm (or OWL for that matter) but I think that most > OWL 2 RL rules are expressible in N3 rules. You would have to come up > with a way to translate the rules with "false" in the head and I am not > sure how the LIST[] expression would be translated to N3 (see for > example rule eq-diff2). > > Anyway, by directly translating the OWL 2 RL rules into N3 you maybe > would be able to do OWL 2 RL reasoning using cwm but it probably > wouldn't be very efficient or scalable (e.g. materializing all > owl:sameAs triples probably isn't the best thing to do). > > What is your use case? > > I'm CCing the cwm mailing list perhaps someone will know more. > > Jakub > > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Jakub Kotowski <jakubkotowski@gmx.net> wrote: >>> Dear Olivier, >>> >>> Olivier Rossel schrieb: >>>> Is there a reference list of all the rules to be implemented by a >>> rules engine >>>> to be fully compliant with RL? >>> The rules are given already in the spec: >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/#Reasoning_in_OWL_2_RL_and_RDF_Graphs_using_Rules >>> >>>> Or, even better, a reference implementation of OWL2-RL for an existing >>>> rules engine? >>> I don't know about any _reference_ implementation but there are some >>> initial implementations - I know Ivan Herman made one and there are >>> other (such as the SAOR reasoner [2]) that are close to OWL 2 RL which >>> partly implement the pD* [1] semantics. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jakub >>> >>> >>> [1] http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1570826805000144 >>> [2] >>> http://axel.deri.ie/presentations/20081029saor_ISWC_btriples_challenge.pdf >>> >> > >
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 20:09:24 UTC