- From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:34:48 +0200
- To: jos.deroo@agfa.com
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, semantic-web-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <o2o516816971004191334t89f6701lbba390b45bc48089@mail.gmail.com>
hi jos, i am glad you are on that discussion, you probably have an opinion about that point: is RL completely targetted at forward engine systems, or are there some subtilities that require a more sohisticated engine beyond RETE capabilities? (this is an open question. if any people involved in RL spec is around, he/she is very welcome to comment) On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:09 PM, <jos.deroo@agfa.com> wrote: > Hi Olivier, > The theories at http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/#theories > are running fine on cwm, except for 2 specific builtins; > those theories are intnded to cover OWL-RL > Kind regards, > > Jos De Roo | Agfa HealthCare > Senior Researcher | HE/Advanced Clinical Applications Research > T +32 3444 7618 > http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ > > Quadrat NV, Kortrijksesteenweg 157, 9830 Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium > http://www.agfa.com/healthcare > > > > *Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>* > Sent by: semantic-web-request@w3.org > > 04/19/2010 05:44 PM > To > Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org> > cc > Subject > Re: Implementing OWL2-RL with a RETE rule engine. > > > > > > thank you for your invaluable information. > > do you think that cwm's architecture is suitable as a rule engine for > OWL2RL? > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Jakub Kotowski <jakubkotowski@gmx.net> > wrote: > > Dear Olivier, > > > > Olivier Rossel schrieb: > >> Is there a reference list of all the rules to be implemented by a > > rules engine > >> to be fully compliant with RL? > > The rules are given already in the spec: > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/#Reasoning_in_OWL_2_RL_and_RDF_Graphs_using_Rules > > > >> Or, even better, a reference implementation of OWL2-RL for an existing > >> rules engine? > > > > I don't know about any _reference_ implementation but there are some > > initial implementations - I know Ivan Herman made one and there are > > other (such as the SAOR reasoner [2]) that are close to OWL 2 RL which > > partly implement the pD* [1] semantics. > > > > Regards, > > Jakub > > > > > > [1] http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1570826805000144 > > [2] > > > http://axel.deri.ie/presentations/20081029saor_ISWC_btriples_challenge.pdf > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 20:40:25 UTC