- From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:44:15 +0200
- To: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
thank you for your invaluable information. do you think that cwm's architecture is suitable as a rule engine for OWL2RL? On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Jakub Kotowski <jakubkotowski@gmx.net> wrote: > Dear Olivier, > > Olivier Rossel schrieb: >> Is there a reference list of all the rules to be implemented by a > rules engine >> to be fully compliant with RL? > The rules are given already in the spec: > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/#Reasoning_in_OWL_2_RL_and_RDF_Graphs_using_Rules > >> Or, even better, a reference implementation of OWL2-RL for an existing >> rules engine? > > I don't know about any _reference_ implementation but there are some > initial implementations - I know Ivan Herman made one and there are > other (such as the SAOR reasoner [2]) that are close to OWL 2 RL which > partly implement the pD* [1] semantics. > > Regards, > Jakub > > > [1] http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1570826805000144 > [2] > http://axel.deri.ie/presentations/20081029saor_ISWC_btriples_challenge.pdf >
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 15:44:51 UTC