- From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:57:10 -0400
- To: "Garret Wilson" <garret@globalmentor.com>
- Cc: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
On 10/18/07, Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com> wrote: ... > When discussing the RDF version of VCard on this list, we spent weeks > arguing about whether the vcard.familyName property should take a single > value or a list, because value order might be important. With URF, the > issue is moot. You can order any property, and only use urf.List when > you're actually talking about a list of things. You can see that this > problem doesn't come up at all in the URF VCard ontology at > <http://www.urf.name/vcard.turf>. Question: are the difficulties around these issues in RDF a consequence of the open world assumption, and the need to be able to merge statements from disparate graphs? Bruce
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:57:26 UTC