- From: Tanja Sieber <tanja.sieber@t-dos.de>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:47:30 +0100
- To: "Frank Manola" <fmanola@acm.org>, "Misha Wolf" <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Cc: "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hey all, I think, this is only my second mail that I post here in this list, because very often I do not really find the time to go as deep in the posted discussion topics as I would like to OR I feel not really adressed to do so. I just want to share my opinion and my point of view regarding some aspects that came out in the last discussion round about explanations of ontologies to humans and also right now about showing the semantic web. I think, that both adresses to the same direction --> we would like (and in my opinion we should) to optimize the understandability of Semantic Web to non-experts. As a newcomer (I still feel so, even if I already started to research half a year ago) it's quite hard to find starter's literature or tutorials. Following the links, that are given here and there, I feel quite often as if the people put anything, what they think, what might be of interest online, not thinking about, for whom this is really interesting for. I feel a great contrast between the idea and the vision behind the Semantic Web, as I understood and understand it and the behaviour of most sites talking about semantic web....Why not being more careful in adding content --> at the moment we do not have yet the Semantic Web (most of us:-) ) and therefore we have to pay attention also to that fact, that it's still hard to find information for people searching for it. Frank mentioned to Misha that sentence: "how clear do you think you've been in explaining why it ought to be of *general* interest " I would like to go even further and adress that question to everyone here " how clear do you think most people have been publishing and contributing something to the term semantic web" "how clear do you think does the main intentions of websites come out, if there is just visible a snippet of a code" That's not your problem, you think? Why not? I think, we should start not only to talk about semantic web, but also DO it (and that can start in small steps, e.g. by presenting content on webpages structured and well-readable, or sharing our experiences like we do here), Tanja P.S.: By the way: does anyone know, why w3schools.org disappeared? ____________ Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit Version: AVK 16.2187 from 14.12.2005 Virus news: www.antiviruslab.com
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2006 08:47:50 UTC