- From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:54:39 -0700
- To: Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xslt-40@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAK4KnZeZ2cVy4wuD+H9MH=pQ5ATf2pc1ke6K3Lhjv6Bn=vpcCQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 10:39 AM Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> writes: > > I would like to see these discussed: > > > > * map:with-default() (initially proposed by Michael Kay in > > https://github.com/qt4cg/qtspecs/issues/105) > > * fn:ranks(), from https://github.com/qt4cg/qtspecs/issues/150 > > I thought that we agreed[1] to discuss the functions proposed in the > current drafts before discussing new functions. That’s not to suggest > that we can’t change our minds, of course. > > Sorry, I meant to include these functions in the document: https://github.com/qt4cg/qtspecs/blob/master/editorial/functions-checklist.pdf ,not to move them before other functions. As we already did with fn:op(), which was not originally on the list. > > WRT our dependency sorting, can we discuss with high priority and > > approve the XPath 4.0 variadic functions, so that immediately after > > that we could typically describe not N overloads of a proposed > > function, but just a single signature containing keyword arguments > > with defaults? > > I’ve added it to the agenda. > Thanks Norm ! > > > Also, some of the functions to be discussed that are included in the > > current list/checklist, depend on using a compare() function / > > strategy. This makes all of them dependent on having first discussed > > and approved fn:deep-equal(options). Therefore, could we move > > fn:deep-equal(options) considerably higher in the list, so that it > > precedes all such functions that are dependent on a compare() > > function/strategy? > > Also on the agenda. > Thanks again. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > [1] https://qt4cg.org/meeting/minutes/2022/09-20.html#org75a1e88 > > -- > Norman Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> > https://nwalsh.com/ > > > Thou shalt not pray to Zeus for things your usual god would laugh at. > Thanks, Dimitre
Received on Sunday, 25 September 2022 17:55:04 UTC