public-xpointer-registry@w3.org from January to March 2008 by thread

formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Tuesday, 4 March)

• Re: formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration Syd Bauman (Wednesday, 5 March)
  • Re: formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 21 March)
    • Re: formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration Syd Bauman (Friday, 21 March)
      • Re: formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 21 March)

New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 dom+cgi@w3.org (Wednesday, 6 February)

• Re: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 Syd Bauman (Wednesday, 6 February)
  • Re: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 Henry S. Thompson (Thursday, 28 February)
    • RE: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 Kumar Pandit (Tuesday, 4 March)
      • RE: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 Philippe Le Hegaret (Tuesday, 4 March)
        • RE: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 Kumar Pandit (Friday, 7 March)
      • RE: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 Kumar Pandit (Friday, 14 March)
        • Re: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 21 March)

Last message date: Friday, 21 March 2008 15:14:18 UTC