Re: formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration from Henry S. Thompson on 2008-03-21 (public-xpointer-registry@w3.org from January to March 2008)

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:13:22 +0000
To: Syd_Bauman@Brown.edu
Cc: public-xpointer-registry@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bmyoshzzh.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Syd Bauman writes:

>> With 20-20 hindsight, I _might_ have realised there was a
>> difference myself if the xpath1 scheme registration text said "The
>> single argument is an XPath Expr" rather than "The single argument
>> is an XPath path". Would you consider updating the description to
>> read that way?
>
> Absolutely. Done. I've also changed the xpath2 scheme and the source
> to the specification, TEI P5. It (P5) won't be reflected on the web
> until the TEI-C releases the next update.

Thanks.

> It's worth someone taking a look to make sure my corrections are
> correct.

Done.  Looks good.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH49CSkjnJixAXWBoRAg1WAJ9+eoldb9l+Zvn0Rwq5ZY0B24R+GQCggVth
P8Z9InsVCq/WYug+dPrFMIo=
=QmZr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 21 March 2008 15:14:18 UTC