Re: formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration from Syd Bauman on 2008-03-21 (public-xpointer-registry@w3.org from January to March 2008)

From: Syd Bauman <Syd_Bauman@Brown.edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:54:39 -0400
To: public-xpointer-registry@w3.org
Message-ID: <18403.52271.451414.571208@emt.wwp.brown.edu>

> With 20-20 hindsight, I _might_ have realised there was a
> difference myself if the xpath1 scheme registration text said "The
> single argument is an XPath Expr" rather than "The single argument
> is an XPath path". Would you consider updating the description to
> read that way?

Absolutely. Done. I've also changed the xpath2 scheme and the source
to the specification, TEI P5. It (P5) won't be reflected on the web
until the TEI-C releases the next update.

It's worth someone taking a look to make sure my corrections are
correct.

Received on Friday, 21 March 2008 14:55:26 UTC