public-xpointer-registry@w3.org from January to March 2008 by author

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration (Tuesday, 4 March)

dom+cgi@w3.org

• New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 (Wednesday, 6 February)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 (Thursday, 28 February)

Kumar Pandit

• RE: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 (Friday, 7 March)
• RE: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 (Tuesday, 4 March)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• RE: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 (Tuesday, 4 March)

Syd Bauman

• Re: formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 (Wednesday, 6 February)

Last message date: Friday, 21 March 2008 15:14:18 UTC