- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:50:03 -0600
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <8738k6vlck.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes
[1]W3C
- DRAFT -
XML Processing Model WG
29 Jan 2014
[2]Agenda
See also: [3]IRC log
Attendees
Present
Norm, Henry, Alex, Jim
Regrets
Chair
Norm
Scribe
Norm
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Accept this agenda?
2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
3. [7]Next meeting: 5 Feb 2014.
4. [8]Open actions
5. [9]Face-to-face planning
6. [10]Rechartering planning
7. [11]Progress on 1.0 bugs
8. [12]Progress on step libraries
9. [13]Any other business?
* [14]Summary of Action Items
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept this agenda?
-> [15]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-agenda
Accepted.
Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
-> [16]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2013/12/11-minutes
Accepted.
Next meeting: 5 Feb 2014.
No regrets heard
Open actions
Jim: I've got the scxml review ready; where should I send it?
Norm: Send it to the WG list.
Face-to-face planning
Norm: Jim wants to participate remotely.
Henry: I'll try to borrow a high-end conference phone for the meeting.
Norm: Thank you, Henry
ACTION A-241-01: Henry to see about borrowing a quality conference phone
for the face-to-face
Henry: I noted an email somewhere about a request for an XProc status
report at the eXist pre-conference
... No, I was mistaken. It wasn't a request.
... It was a link to a presentation at Stylus Studio.
Jim: I have a pending pull request to eXist to update the Calabash
implementation.
Alex: I see Jim is on the pre-conference agenda now, I don't think he was
there yesterday.
<ht>
[17]http://www.stylusstudio.com/XML-Editor-Blog/2014/01/15/XML-Pipelines-Presentation.aspx
Jim: What's the agenda?
Norm: I think we should begin to look at technical solutions for the
requirements.
Norm: In advance of a rechartering, that's a little risky, but if nothing
else it's an exploration of the requirements.
Alex: I've made dinner reservations for us on Wednesday night, 19 Feb, at
7:30p.
Rechartering planning
Norm: The thrust here is: no more XPP
See:
[18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2014Jan/0020.html
<jf_2013> +1 to that
<ht> Silence gives consent
No objections heard.
Norm: If we're not carrying XPP forward, I think we should wrap it up and
publish it as a note.
<jf_2013> +1
<jf_2013> to publishing as a note
Alex: Do we need to do anything?
Henry: I think I've done the important ones. The only question is, should
we take the pictures and discussion about validation back out?
Norm: Why?
Henry: It's had no review.
Norm: I think we can leave it in.
Jim: For what it's worth, I found the flowcharts useful.
ACTION A-240-02: Package up the current XPP document as a Note and request
publication.
Norm: I'll touch base with Liam and drop the open actions related to XPP
except for that one.
Progress on 1.0 bugs
Norm: We've received some community pushback on resolving 1.0 bugs. I did
a couple.
->
[19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2014Jan/0009.html
Norm attempts to explain.
Henry: I think I prefer caching, but we can't do that as an erratum, it
has to go in V2.
Norm: I suppose as an erratum, we have to say the document-uri property is
empty.
Henry: My inclination is to simply publish an erratum that says there's a
bug here; that the spec is underspecified; it's defacto implementation
dependent in V1; we'll fix it in V2.
Norm: I'm happy with that.
Norm mumbles on about what XML Calabash does
<jf_2013> I thnk your response was valid, there does seem to be some
interesting corner cases with pitfalls lurking
<jf_2013> which may indicate deeper investigation
Norm: I propose we take Henry's suggestion; document the bug, explain that
it's probably too large a change to make as an erratum and assert that
it's implementation dependent
<jf_2013> +1
Accepted.
Alex: How are we tracking these in V2?
Norm: I just wrote it in a buffer. I'll work on figuring out how to track
them; perhaps at github
ACTION A-241-03: Norm to ask Liam about using github
<jf_2013> +1 to using git/github
->
[20]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2014Jan/0011.html
Norm: Bug 21001
<jf_2013> +1 looks good to me as well
Alex: Looks good to me.
Henry: Yep.
ACTION A-241-04: Norm to construct an actual errata document with these
two errata in it
<alexmilowski> BTW, document-uri() comes from the XDM from the document
node ancestor if it exists.
<alexmilowski> So, by default it returns whatever that property contains.
Progress on step libraries
Jim reports no progress on zip and unzip
Norm reports no progress on the file and system utility libraries
Norm mutters a bit about his semantic web step experiments
ACTION A-241-04 Alex to describe use cases for RDF support that require
the ability to go back and forth from the triples to the documents.
Jim: What part of our requirements does RDF come under?
Norm: I don't think it's a requirement per se, but building step libraries
is valuable.
Any other business?
None heard
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [21]scribe.perl version 1.138 ([22]CVS
log)
$Date: 2014-01-29 15:48:45 $
References
1. http://www.w3.org/
2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-agenda
3. http://www.w3.org/2014/01/29-xproc-irc
4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes#agenda
5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes#item01
6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes#item02
7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes#item03
8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes#item04
9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes#item05
10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes#item06
11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes#item07
12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes#item08
13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes#item09
14. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes#ActionSummary
15. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-agenda
16. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2013/12/11-minutes
17. http://www.stylusstudio.com/XML-Editor-Blog/2014/01/15/XML-Pipelines-Presentation.aspx
18. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2014Jan/0020.html
19. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2014Jan/0009.html
20. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2014Jan/0011.html
21. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
22. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2014 15:50:40 UTC