- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:58:11 -0600
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- CC: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <87mwifdb0s.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Hi folks, As it comes time to consider rechartering, I think we need to face the fact that the WG has, by and large, lost the will to push XPP forward. I propose that we do not want it in our next charter. In fact, if I'm perfectly honest, I propose that we abandon it now: * The original intent was that we'd define *the* XML processing model. I think we've clearly shown that there is no "the" model, there are a space of possibilities. * Further, I think our experience with getting the document published demonstrates that there is not even consensus within the community about the right way to characterize that space or even by what criteria. * I don't think one can argue persuasively that the document will have more value as a Recommendation than it will as a Note. And we can publish it as a Note today. * It has been overtaken by events. Today, anyone designing an API for which this document would provide useful guidance is vastly more likely to use JSON than XML. Any API with enough complexity to make XML the likely choice is probably going to wrestle with issues that this document doesn't address. * I believe our staff contact would support a motion to abandon it as a Recommendation track requirement. It's a dead horse, can we please stop beating it now? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 21:58:40 UTC