- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:40:46 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m24p6edqu9.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Toman_Vojtech@emc.com was heard to say: | If I read the spec correctly, schema definitions from schema A are | available in the nested pipeline. But what about the other way around? I | would say that in the scope of the nested pipeline, the schema | definitions from schema B will be "merged" with A, but they will not be | visible in the top-level pipeline. Is this correct? Nope. As spec'd right now, they're all merged into one great big bag and they're all visible everywhere. | Is p:import-schema still considered a feature at risk? If so, the spec | does not mention this. We did, the editor just forgot to put that bit in. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The greatest mystery is not that we http://nwalsh.com/ | have been flung at random between the | profusion of matter and of the stars, | but that within this prison we can draw | from ourselves images powerful enough | to deny our nothingness.--Andre Malraux
Received on Friday, 25 July 2008 13:41:39 UTC