- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:44:12 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> / Toman_Vojtech@emc.com was heard to say:
> | If I read the spec correctly, schema definitions from schema A are
> | available in the nested pipeline. But what about the other way around? I
> | would say that in the scope of the nested pipeline, the schema
> | definitions from schema B will be "merged" with A, but they will not be
> | visible in the top-level pipeline. Is this correct?
>
> Nope. As spec'd right now, they're all merged into one great big bag
> and they're all visible everywhere.
Hmm. See minutes of yesterday's non-meeting for evidence that it
didn't read that way to us. . .
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIidiskjnJixAXWBoRAjG/AJ9b98jzs9smn56G4mUbwMbkVrc3+gCfbJkd
gAvjE6Il22xaQdWBBd76pLU=
=ni7m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 25 July 2008 13:44:49 UTC