- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:45:29 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2ej4hrwna.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> writes: > Well, may I ask you to elaborate on this ? Sure. Imagine that library.xpl contains: <p:library ...> <p:declare-step name="xinclude-and-xslt">...</p:declare-step> </p:library> Consider the following imaginary command line syntax: $ calabash -isource=- -oresult=- -s xinclude-and-xslt library.xpl This tells the processor to load "library.xpl" and run the step named "xinclude-and-xslt". All straightforward. Now suppose I want to just run the "add-attribute" step. I could wrap it in a pipeline, put it in a library, give it a name, and run it. But since the library for the XProc builtin steps is always loaded (at least conceptually), why do I have to do that? Why can't I just say: $ calabash -isource=- -oresult=- -s add-attribute \ match=div attribute-name=foo attribute-value=bar I can't because the standard p:add-attribute step doesn't have a name. I was wondering if we couldn't do something about that. But I don't think we can. However, I think I'll work around the problem by saying that if you don't load a pipeline or a library and if you specify a step name then the xml:id values of the standard steps are considered for the purpose of matching the specified name. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Whatever else we are intended to do, we http://nwalsh.com/ | are not intended to succeed: failure is | the fate allotted.--Robert Louis | Stevenson
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 13:46:31 UTC