- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:39:31 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 13:40:26 UTC
"Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> writes: > this one still apply > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote: >> Please add a reference to RFC 4122 Why? We don't say anything about urn:uuid: URIs, do we? I agree it would be nice to have normative references for the UUID step and the various hash algorithms, but I don't think this is it. (Nor is it clear to me what they should be from RFC 4122's normative references.) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | My problems start when the smarter http://nwalsh.com/ | bears and the dumber visitors | intersect.--Steve Thompson, wildlife | biologist at Yosemite National Park
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 13:40:26 UTC