Re: Unserializable documents

/ Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> was heard to say:
| The way I read this, this implies that an implementation is fine using
| SAX (or SAX++ to handle sequences) between components, without adding
| a whole lot of necessary processing of those SAX events between steps.
| So this is good.

Yes.

| But shouldn't we specify what we mean by "namespace fixup" (maybe a
| reference to the XSLT specification?) and "other necessary
| adjustments"?

On reflection, I think namespace fixup is *all* we mean. I'll steal a
defn from XSLT, I think.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | One of the great misfortunes of mankind
http://nwalsh.com/            | is that even his good qualities are
                              | sometimes useless to him, and that the
                              | art of employing and well directing
                              | them is often the latest fruit of his
                              | experience.-- Chamfort