- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 12:45:19 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87hcpwhp7k.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | It seems one more time impression are conflicting with statement Right. We need to say what you suggested: | <p:option | name = QName | select = XPath expression> | (p:pipe | | p:document | | p:inline)? | </p:option> | | Then what is the context of the XPath evaluation when none is | specified ? an empty sequence ? the default readable port ? something | other ? I think we should say that if an explicit context is not given then there is no context. In that case, any expression that makes reference to the context (by using "/", or position(), or anything else that would refer to the context) is an error. The JAXP API is already spec'd this way and I think other XPath APIs are similar. Without a context, you can still resolve variable references, perform string manipulations, etc. so it is valuable. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Wink at small faults; for thou has http://nwalsh.com/ | great ones.--Thomas Fuller (II)
Received on Monday, 28 May 2007 16:45:37 UTC