- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 19:41:58 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | It seems one more time impression are conflicting with statement > > Right. We need to say what you suggested: > > | <p:option > | name = QName > | select = XPath expression> > | (p:pipe | > | p:document | > | p:inline)? > | </p:option> > | > | Then what is the context of the XPath evaluation when none is > | specified ? an empty sequence ? the default readable port ? something > | other ? > > I think we should say that if an explicit context is not given then > there is no context. In that case, any expression that makes reference > to the context (by using "/", or position(), or anything else that > would refer to the context) is an error. I'd prefer it to default to the first document on the default readable port. Jeni -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Monday, 28 May 2007 18:42:11 UTC