- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:13:13 -0400
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Thursday, 2007 May 24 14:03 > To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > Subject: Making progress > Obviously, we have to reach consensus on a design that satisfies our > use cases and requirements and which we all feel meets the needs of > our ultimate users. No, that's not obvious to me at all. I have always thought the tendency in W3C work was to try to put too much into V1. I personally (and, for that matter, as an AC rep) feel that a WG's chartered time line is at least as important--if not more so--than any particular requirement/use case, and I would strongly argue to drop features from V1 in order to meet our charter deadline. The longer it takes to get out V1, the more people realize it will be even longer until V2 which makes people more interested in getting more into V1 which makes it longer to get out V1.... My suggestion would be to drop features (provided we have a design that doesn't foreclose on them in the future) as necessary to get out a V1 before our charter ends. Then we can spend the time at our f2f in November discussing V2 instead of fooling around with CR comments or whatever. paul
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 19:17:43 UTC