- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 12:47:58 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 5/24/07, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote: > My suggestion would be to drop features (provided we have > a design that doesn't foreclose on them in the future) as > necessary to get out a V1 before our charter ends. Then > we can spend the time at our f2f in November discussing V2 > instead of fooling around with CR comments or whatever. > I'd be very happy to drop features and, if necessary, revise our requirements document to requirements document to identify future features and use cases. We've spent a massive amount of time on parameters and, in the end, I'm not convinced that we need all the features and complexity we have or are now considering. Others feed strongly about having such complexity but I'm not certain that our *current* requirements document reflects that need. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 19:48:10 UTC