- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:17:30 -0800
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2007 00:17:45 UTC
On 1/31/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > > / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: > | This component allows both XSLT 1.0 and 2.0 transformations but > | implementations > > I think that's a mistake. It will require, at the very least, some extra > bit of annotation in order for the pipeline author to assert that she > wants exactly one version or the other. We don't have (or have need for) > an annotation framework to specify that. The are specifying what they want in the XSLT transformation with the version attribute. A smart implementation can do the right thing a choose the right processor. I did that in smallx in that XSLT 1.0 was handled by my version of XT and XSLT 2.0 was handled by saxon. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2007 00:17:45 UTC