- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:04:41 -0800
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 1/31/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote: > A smart implementation can do the right thing a choose the right > processor. I did that in smallx in that XSLT 1.0 was handled by my version > of XT and XSLT 2.0 was handled by saxon. I agree. I just have some doubts about the warning mechanism. I am referring to: "An implementations are allowed to use and XSLT 2.0 processor to run an XSLT 1.0 transformation but a warning must be issued". I would prefer, like Norm suggested, to have an optional parameter that the pipeline author can set to say that he really wants to use an 1.0 engine or a 2.0 engine, whatever the version attribute in the stylesheet says. In most cases pipeline authors won't need to worry about this parameter and everything will work for them as expected. Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise, Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2007 02:04:46 UTC