- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:21:05 -0800
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <28d56ece0701311621k7905c6aerfebfd21a15e5e5f1@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/31/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > > > We decided not to have implicit processing of sequences. I think the > identity component should take a single document, not a sequence. I agree with not having implicit iteration. In this case I don't see this as iteration as it is copying the input to the output. We have said that a component that produces a sequence would be allowed to be hooked up to a component that takes a single document as long as the sequence was a singleton. I think the reverse needs to be true in that a single document should be able to be treated as a singleton. If we don't allow identity to process sequences, then an author has to do different things to setup and identity step or placeholder depending on where they are in their pipeline. I think that will make things difficult for the pipeline author to understand. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2007 00:21:11 UTC