- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:04:48 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 5/19/06, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > Peephole (we really need a better name) is the component that takes an > XPath expression that (presumably) identifies an element and applies > the steps to that subtree. > > You could, for example, apply XSLT to each of the <chapter> elements > in a book without ever having to load the entire book into memory > (assuming your implementation was smart enough to evaluate the > expression in a streaming fashion). Norm, I thought I understood what you meant after reading your first paragraph above, and then I got confused by the second one. With what you are saying about applying an XSLT on each chapter of a book, how would the peephole be different than the for-each? Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Friday, 19 May 2006 22:04:59 UTC