- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:13:53 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87mzdc2ycu.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> was heard to say: | On 5/19/06, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: |> Peephole (we really need a better name) is the component that takes an |> XPath expression that (presumably) identifies an element and applies |> the steps to that subtree. |> |> You could, for example, apply XSLT to each of the <chapter> elements |> in a book without ever having to load the entire book into memory |> (assuming your implementation was smart enough to evaluate the |> expression in a streaming fashion). [...] | I thought I understood what you meant after reading your first | paragraph above, and then I got confused by the second one. With what | you are saying about applying an XSLT on each chapter of a book, how | would the peephole be different than the for-each? The for-each component, as I understand it, applies a step (or group of steps) to each document in a sequence of documents. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Saturday, 20 May 2006 21:14:00 UTC