- From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:00:28 +0200
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Well 1) it is an optional step, so I won't die for that (people can do p:xquery11) 2) there is a lot of profile for XQuery (Update, Scripting extension, etc..) 3) we should be consistent with p:xsl-formatter (2.0 in the pipe), p:validate-with-xml-schema (1.1 in the pipe), p:validate-with-relax-ng (some amendments in the pipe), etc. I don't think this problem is easy to solve The only thing I see is to have on all step that rely on a specifiction to have <p:option name="version"> with a consistent story, so that we don't have to come back to it Xmlizer On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Our XQuery step claims to support explicitly XQuery 1.0. I propose > that we relax that and give processors the freedom to support both 1.0 > and any future version of XQuery. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Man, whatever he may think, is a very > http://nwalsh.com/ | limited being; the world is a narrow > | circle drawn about him; the horizon > | limits our immediate view; immortality > | means a century or two.-- Hazlitt >
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 06:01:08 UTC