- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:34:42 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2hc116ybx.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes: > Hi all, > > Is there a reason why we have two error codes for invalid option values, > and not just one? > > err:XD0019 > > It is a dynamic error if any option value does not satisfy the type > required for that option. > > err:XC0016 > > It is a dynamic error if the value supplied for any option specified > for any step in this section is not of the type mandated in the step > description, with phrases such as "The value of the some-name option > must be a QName" or "the value of the some-flag option must be a > boolean". > > The only difference I see between err:XC0016 and err:XD0019 is that > err:XC0016 is meant specifically for the standard step library. But is > it necessary? Per the 29 January minutes, I have removed err:XC0016. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The common excuse of those who bring http://nwalsh.com/ | misfortune on others is that they | desire their good.-- Vauvenargues
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 01:35:34 UTC