- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:49:17 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:49:33 UTC
/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say: | I think we can all see value in specifying static and dynamic error | output as well formed xml | | for example; | | <err:result> | <err:XS0049>It is a static error if the psvi-required attribute is | "true" and the processor does not support passing PSVI annotations | between steps.</err:XS0049> | </err:result> | | is this something to leave as an implementation detail or should we | amend 6 Errors section a little bit ? I don't think we should say anything about how errors are reported. Note, however, that, c:error generated errors will be WF XML by virtue of being an input to a step. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is important what a man still plans http://nwalsh.com/ | at the end. It shows the measure of | injustice in his death.--Elias Canetti
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:49:33 UTC