- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:47:20 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2myputipj.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say: | it makes sense if what u want is to have a log of what happened at | that step and capture all input/output e.g. consider the trivial | example log output I generate from a declare-step with a | log="somefile.xml" attribute. | | <step name="mystep"> | <input port="">some xml that came in</input> | <output port="">xml output of the step</input> | </step> | | I see this as a useful debugging output on <p:pipeline/>, <p:group/>, | try/catch, etc ... I'm sorry, Jim, but I don't follow that example at all. I don't see *any* log attribute or element there, so I'm not sure what you're getting at. | keeping the log format XML I think is useful as | well. I don't think we want to say anything about the format, especially since I don't want to attempt to solve the "how do you represent a sequence of documents" question. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The common excuse of those who bring http://nwalsh.com/ | misfortune on others is that they | desire their good.-- Vauvenargues
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:47:34 UTC