- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:24:32 -0500
- To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: public-xml-id@w3.org
- Message-id: <87sm4ogl2n.fsf@nwalsh.com>
The XML Core WG discussed this issue at the 26 Jan telcon[1] and concluded: > ERH raised an issue with xml:id and canonicalization: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-id/2005Jan/0037 > Norm's forward to the XML Core list: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Jan/0049 We agree that the problem is a problem in the C14N spec. The C14N spec is not currently being maintained by any WG, so Henry suggests we pick it up to correct this "erratum". ACTION to Paul: Email the XML CG about this problem. It was pointed out that no one can be using xml:id now, so all we are invalidating are implementations, not documents. Richard points out that xml:base already do not work properly if it is assumed to inherit as specified in the C14N spec. For the purposes of xml:id, all we can do is include a non-normative Note about this problem. ACTION to Norm: Add such a non-normative note. Be seeing you, norm [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Jan/0065.html -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 17:25:06 UTC