- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:30:26 -0800
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: public-xml-id@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 06:30:29 UTC
/ Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> was heard to say: | The Good News: | xml:id is almost conformant to QA SpecGL LC version Nov 22, 2004 | if you modify the specification for | - 3.2.B "Indicate which conformance requirements | are mandatory, which are recommended and | which are optional." | - 4.3.A "Address Extensibility" | | which are both really easy to meet. It's just a question of wording. I have updated the draft[1] to address both of these issues. Please let me know if this satisfies your comment. Be seeing you, norm [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xmlid/xml-id.html -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 06:30:29 UTC