Re: Proposed erratum to unreserve names beginning xml

Paul Grosso scripsit:

> All Norm is saying here (and with which Henry and I agree) is that we
> need not say anything about element and attribute names starting with
> xml because if we ever need such, we'd use namespaces.

We don't want to license people who use pure XML 1.x to use "xml:foo",
though, which is a valid XML 1.0 name.  So I think we still need to
reserve element/attribute names beginning "xml:".

-- 
John Cowan                                <cowan@ccil.org>
Yakka foob mog.  Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork.  Chumble spuzz.
    --Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"

Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 21:49:54 UTC