- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:57:31 +0800
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>, core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:49:23PM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > Paul Grosso scripsit: > > > All Norm is saying here (and with which Henry and I agree) is that we > > need not say anything about element and attribute names starting with > > xml because if we ever need such, we'd use namespaces. > > We don't want to license people who use pure XML 1.x to use "xml:foo", > though, which is a valid XML 1.0 name. So I think we still need to > reserve element/attribute names beginning "xml:". good point ! +1 Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
Received on Monday, 17 December 2012 07:58:12 UTC