- From: François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:38:44 -0700
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Regrets, can't make it today. -- François Grosso, Paul a écrit : > > > We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, > March 12, from > 08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka > 11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka > 15:00-16:00 UTC > 15:00-16:00 in Ireland and the UK !!!!!!! > 16:00-17:00 in middle (most of) Europe !!!!!!! > on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. > We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . > > See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents > and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please > email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. > > Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and > completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it > at the beginning of the call. > > ************************************************************* > > NOTE: This telcon (and the upcoming telcon of March 26) > occur one hour earlier than usual local time for partipants > in the UK and Europe due to a early switch to DST > on the part of those in North America. > > ************************************************************* > > Agenda > ====== > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). > > > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. > > CURIEs et al. > ------------- > The XHTML2 Working Group plans to take CURIE Syntax 1.0 at: > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-curie-20080122/ to Last Call. > > Both Norm and Henry have reviewed it on the Tag list: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Feb/0050 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Feb/0053 > > XML would have to change for CURIEs to do what they want to do. > > The key issue with CURIEs is the restriction on name start > characters for the value of ids (which is now an NCName). > > Henry asks us to consider changing the type of an id attribute > from NCName to NMTOKEN. > > Norm sent his thoughts on redefining QNames at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Feb/0030 > > John suggests we shouldn't change QNames--which are for element > and attribute names--but perhaps come up with another term--or > just use the term CURIEs--for this new concept. > > Philippe says that sparql has already come up with a CURIE-like > concept (and it is already a Rec): > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-rdf-sparql-query-20080115/#QSynIRI > > Henry has done some research on the use of non-names for ids > on the web. > > Norm blogged on a possible XML 2.0: > http://norman.walsh.name/2008/02/20/xml20 > > ---- > > October Technical Plenary > ------------------------- > The next Technical Plenary is scheduled for October in Cannes: > http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/Overview.html > We need to decide if we wish to meet there. > > ---- > > Element Traversal Specification Review > -------------------------------------- > We have been asked to review > Element Traversal Specification (Web API WG) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-ElementTraversal-20080303/ > > John reviewed it at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Mar/0003 > and found no issues for us. Philippe concurred at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Mar/0005 > > > 3. C14N > > The C14N 1.1 PR has been published: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PR-xml-c14n11-20080129/ > > Known Issues with Canonical XML 1.0 (C14N/1.0) WG Note > has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-C14N-issues-20061220/ > > Using XML Digital Signatures in the 2006 XML Environment > WG Note has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-DSig-usage-20061220/ > > > 4. XML 1.0 5th Edition > > The XML 1.0 5th Edition PER has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xml-20080205/ > > > 5. XML 1.0/1.1 4th/2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: > > Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816 > > Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816 > > Henry/Richard discussed the test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > > These need to be resolved. > > Richard reports that the 2005 issue has been resolved in the > latest draft. > > The one from 2006, character references with numbers with > dozens of digits, may not be. > > ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues. > > At some point in the future (e.g., six months after XML 1.0 5th > Edition is a Recommendation) we might consider deprecating XML 1.1. > > > 6. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: > > Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816 > > Namespaces in XML 1.1 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816 > > Richard has recorded Anne's issue/proposed resolution at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata#NPE27 > > ACTION to Richard: Look into Anne's (two) comments at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2007Oct/ > > --- > > We discussed processing an erratum to NS 1.0 that adds the > ability to undeclare a namespace prefix in NS 1.0. > > We could probably make NS 1.0 a copy of NS 1.1 with appropriate > minor changes. > > > 7. LEIRIs > > Martin's latest IRI draft (defining LEIRIs in section 7) is at > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-bis-02.txt > > Martin's latest email is at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0042 > > Paul's summary of what comes next spec-by-spec is at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 > > > 8. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER > > The (Second Edition) XML Base PER has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PER-xmlbase-20061220/ > > Richard has produced a PER-ready draft of XML Base at: > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/xmlbase-2e/ > > We will plan to publish this as a second PER in the March > timeframe with the understanding it can't go to Rec until > the IRI RFC is republished. > > ACTION to Richard: Add a para to the SOTD explaining that we > will await for the 3987bis to become an RFC before going to Rec. > > ACTION to Richard: Update refs (to XML and NS) to be undated. > > Paul drafted a transition request for XML Base 2nd Ed (2nd) PER at: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Feb/0049 > > ACTION to Henry, Philippe, and Richard: Review Paul's draft > transition request for XML Base. > > We will plan for the WG to approve to go to PER on our next > telcon on March 12. > > After the transition is approved, Paul makes a pub request > and Henry writes and sends out an announcement. > > > 9. XLink update. > > The XLink CR was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ > > The latest almost PR-ready XLink draft is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ > > Norm posted a DoC at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/10/xlink11-doc.html > > Paul wrote a SECOND draft PR request at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Dec/0059 > > We decided the next step would be another LC. > > LEIRI reference: > Section 5.4: > > replace para starting: > > The value of the href attribute is an XML resource identifer... > > with: > > The value of the href attribute is a LEIRI [ref]. > > and then delete subsection 5.4.1 but move the para about > relative references up into 5.4. > > ACTION to Norm: Suggest any other appropriate changes to XLink 1.1. > > ACTION to Norm: Produce diff/review version. > > ACTION to Norm: Produce a LC-ready draft of XLink 1.1 with > a reference to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. > > John suggests we have two levels of conformance at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Feb/0044 > > > 10. XInclude 3rd Edition > > XInclude 2nd Edition is at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 > > LEIRI-related changes for the 3rd Edition: > > 3.1, href attribute is a LEIRI > > See also 4.1.1 (details TBD) which can't reference XML 1.1 > since we don't define XML Resource Identifiers in XML 1.1. > Just replace that para with the "They are LEIRIs" para. > > See also > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0007 > for more details on the necessary changes. > > ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed > with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Feb/0023 > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:40:32 UTC