- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:37:38 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Attendees --------- Paul Glenn Arnaud xx:23 Sandra Norm Leonid Daniel John xx:23 François [7 organizations (7 with proxies) present out of 11] Regrets ------- Henry Absent organizations -------------------- Oracle Univ of Edinburgh W3C (with regrets) Lew Shannon > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). Accepted. > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia. > > The next W3C Technical Plenary Week will be 28 February 2005 > through 4 March 2005: > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html > http://www.w3.org/2004/12/allgroupoverview.html > > Unless things change (unlikely), the XML Core WG f2f meeting > days will be Thursday and Friday, March 3rd and 4th. > > Register for the meeting at: > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TP2005/ > > Register at the hotel: > http://www.w3.org/2004/12/allgroupoverview.html#Venue. > The negotiated room rate at the meeting hotel, Hyatt Harborside, > http://harborside.hyatt.com/property/index.jhtml is $139 (plus 12.45% > tax); this discount rate expires 5 February 2005. > > ACTION: Norm will try to set up a meeting time with the TAG > during the Tech Plen week in case we have something to discuss > with them by then. > > Would the XML Core WG (or any members therein) want to > participate in a Technical Plenary week discussion about > "Extensibility and Versioning of XML Languages"? See > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Jan/0013 Norm will attend if there is such a session. Otherwise we will attendance up to the individual member. > > 2.5 All XML Activity WGs have been asked to review > QA Framework: Specification Guidelines > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ > whose Last Call Ends 28 January 2005. > > ACTION to Dmitry: Review QA Framework: Specification Guidelines > and report back to the XML Core WG by January 18th. ACTION continued. > > 3. XLink update. > > We will have to make it an XLink 1.1, and we need to make a > charter change. > > The XML CG suggested that someone (SVG or XML Core) > write a WG Note that effectively outlines the desired changes > to XLink. Then, we can put through an XML Core WG charter > change that allows us specifically to issue an XLink 1.1 that > implements the changes in the Note. > > We decided to develop a WG Note "Extending XLink 1.0" that > lists the changes we suggest to XLink 1.0, and Norm has drafted: > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/xlink10-ext.html > > At this week's telcon we plan to agree to send notice to chairs; > and then next week we will approve sending in the pubrequest. CONSENSUS: Norm and Paul will massage the status, and then they will announce the above URL to the chairs list. > > 4. XML errata. The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the > published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC > Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. > > [Due to technical difficulties, the PE document is currently > "empty" as I write this agenda.] Annoyingly, this remains a problem, and neither Paul nor Francois has gotten an answer from webreq for almost a week. ACTION to Philippe: Tackle webreq and try to make progress on this issue. > > 5. Namespaces in XML. > > Ongoing ACTION to Richard: Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed. > > Paul checked with W3C folks about whether we can > fold editorial errata from 1.1 back into 1.0 2nd Ed > and our plan is acceptable: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Nov/0041 > > Richard pointed out a namespace comment at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2004Dec/0000 > which requests something which is almost a different kind of schema. > > ACTION to Richard: Send email outlining the issue and your suggested > resolution. ACTION continued. > > 6. Xinclude Rec was published 2004 December 30 at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xinclude-20041220/ > > It has been brought to my attention that we apparently failed > to look at the public XInclude comments list for comments > received during the PR review which is basically the October > archives for this list: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-xinclude-comments/2004Oct/ > We will treat these are errata. > > DV volunteers to be editor of the XInclude errata process. > > ACTION to DV: Create a PE document for XInclude. ACTION continued. > > 7. xml:id. > > Our Last Call of xml:id is published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xml-id-20041109/ > > The latest WG draft (dated 2005 January 5) is at > > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xmlid/xml-id.html > > The (public) xml:id LC issues is at: > http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-id/lc-status/status-report.html > > ACTION to Norm: Update it to reflect our latest decisions and > recent emails. XSL/XQuery comments on xml:id ----------------------------- The two bullet points in appendix C that attempt to define the impact on XPath 1.0 and 2.0 should be removed. DECISION: We plan to remove at least these points and perhaps all of Appendix C before it becomes a Rec, but we wish to leave it now. We will add a Note in the draft something to this effect. CR Exit Criteria (Ian Hickson) ------------------------------ Request to use CR exit criteria like the CSS2.1 CR exit criteria. ACTION to Norm: Define our CR exit criteria and see if it satisfies Ian, and put it into the Status section. xml:id LC - Conformance to SpecGL --------------------------------- ACTION to Norm: Try to massage the spec to address whatever he thinks SpecGL seems to require. ACTION to Norm: Produce a CR draft. Norm has one. DV has one, but it's not fully complete yet. ACTION to JohnC: Lobby ERH to do an implementation of xml:id. We will need a test suite. Norm has created a test suite. ACTION to Norm: Put the test suite into public space. ACTION to Sandra: Create an xml:id test suite front page. > > paul > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Jan/0011 > [7] > http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html > [8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata > [9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:37:46 UTC