Re: Extending XLink 1.0

/ Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> was heard to say:
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
|> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
|> Sent: Wednesday, 05 January, 2005 10:23
|> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
|> Subject: Extending XLink 1.0
|> 
|> Core,
|> 
|> I've corrected the typos that Paul noted and added a new change
|> suggestion for new schema languages. The draft at 
|> 
|>   http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/xlink10-ext.html
|> 
|> has been updated.
|
| I'd like to see the word "non-normative" (or "informative")
| somewhere in point 4.  I don't want anyone getting excited
| about a possibly normative RelaxNG grammar.

Done.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.