- From: Sandra Martinez <sandra.martinez@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:49:50 -0400
- To: "Paul Grosso" <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Regrets. Sandra At 11:35 AM 10/18/2004, Paul Grosso wrote: >We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, >Ocotber 20, from > 08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka > 11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka > 15:00-16:00 UTC > 16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK > 17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe >on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. >We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . > >[For those wondering, the switch from daylight savings time >to standard time occurs on October 31st for the home locale >of everyone on the WG.] > >See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents >and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please >email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. > >Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and >completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it >at the beginning of the call. > >Agenda >====== >1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). > > >2. Miscellaneous administrivia. > >The next W3C Technical Plenary Week will be 28 February 2005 >through 4 March 2005: > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html > >The meeting will be held in the Hyatt Harborside, Boston: > http://harborside.hyatt.com/property/index.jhtml > > >3. Problem with xml:space in the Schema document for the XML namespace > >Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org> sent us email on this at: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Jul/0019 > >CONSENSUS to remove the default for xml:space from the schema >for the xml namespace. > >Henry drafted a new schema and send it to the XML Core list: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0007 > >Henry's suggested new schema includes xml:id. Are we anticipating >too much here? > >Henry and DV think it's fine. Norm too. What about others? > >Barring new comments to the contrary, we will approve the change >this week. > > >4. XML errata. The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the > published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC > Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. > >Glenn has raised a question at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Sep/0080 >about the wording for the ANY and mixed content models and whether >they allow cdata sections and/or comments and PIs. > >All on the phone (and Francois in previous email) agree that we meant >to allows cdata sections and PIs and comments in these models. > >Glenn proposed corrected wording at: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0004 > >We had CONSENSUS to go with Glenn's words (with Paul's commas). > >ACTION to Francois: Make this a PE and put Glenn's words into >a 2 week countdown (starting Oct 13th). > >The xml-editor list just received a comment at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2004OctDec/0003 >which is presumably asking the same question asked earlier at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2003OctDec/0048 >and which the commenter claims we never answered satisfactorily. >I see at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2003OctDec/0233 >JohnC suggested: > > 8) NEL issue can be bypassed by using different transcoding >conventions. > See >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2003OctDec/0048.html . > > Recommendation: Reject. Special code pages for XML are undesirable, > and older mainframe tools can't cope with them anyway. > >I cannot find any response to commentor, DOC for the XML 1.1 PR (beyond >this email) or other follow up. > >I suggest we need to make this latest comment a PE and be sure to >process it carefully to document whatever decision we take. > >ACTION to Francois: Make xml-editor/2004OctDec/0003 a PE. > > >5. Namespaces in XML. > > ACTION to Richard: Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed. > > >6. Xinclude PR was published Sept 30 at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PR-xinclude-20040930/ > and announced to the AC at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2004JulSep/0043 > > Please be sure your AC reps vote on it by October 29. > >Sandra has added ERH's tests to the XInclude Test Suite. > >Check on status of recently added ERH tests (I gather they >are in CVS, but not in the tar or zip, but maybe I'm mistaken). > > >7. xml:id. > >Norm has collected the xml:id issues, now (public) at: >http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-id/wd-status/status-report.html >[Not quite up to date as of the writing of this agenda, but >all issues are closed.] > >Norm just put a new draft (2004 October 15) up at: >http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xmlid/xml-id.html >It presumably reflects all our decisions. READ IT! > >If the WG approves, we could consider taking it to Last Call. >What do members think? > > >8. XML Profile. The TAG (via Norm) asks about progress on this: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Sep/0004 > > > >[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core >[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks >[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0009 >[7] >http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html >[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata >[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata Sandra I. Martinez National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899 (301) 975-3579 sandra.martinez@nist.gov
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 13:50:03 UTC