- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:43:17 +0100
- To: "Paul Grosso" <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
So we (mostly Richard and I, but also the WG) dropped the ball on
this.
We discussed it in April and May, and finally, on 19 May [1]
"We should fix things so that http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace
return just the RDDL document regardless of content-type. Richard
and Henry know how to do this and suggest we do this.
"In addition, they suggest we add comments to the obsolete schemas
saying they are obsolete. CONSENSUS among those on the call to
accept Richard and Henry's suggestions.
"We DECIDED to put this decision into "countdown" until next week
in case someone not on the call has any comments. Next week,
barring objections, we will task Richard and Henry to implement
this decision.
and again on 26 May [2]
"We reaffirmed CONSENSUS to go with the above suggestion.
"ACTION to Richard and Henry: Implement the above suggestion to fix up
the XML namespace directory."
we decided to fix things.
However, on 2 June [3], despite neither Richard or me having done
anything, we find:
"| 2. XML Schema WG is handing off maintenance of the XML namespace to us:
| http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2004JanMar/0251
|
| ACTION to Richard and Henry: Implement the above suggestion to fix
| up the XML namespace directory.
"Completed."
Oops.
ht
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2004AprJun/0097.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2004AprJun/0110.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2004AprJun/0120.html
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 13:43:21 UTC