- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:07:03 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Attendees --------- Paul Arnaud Dmitry Norm Leonid Richard xx:09 Henry Daniel John xx:13 [8 organizations (8 with proxies) present out of 12] Regrets ------- Glenn François Lew Absent organizations -------------------- Microsoft NIST François Yergeau (with regrets) Lew Shannon (with regrets) > > Agenda > ====== > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). Accepted. > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia. > > The next W3C Technical Plenary Week will be 28 February 2005 > through 4 March 2005: > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html > > The meeting will be held in the Hyatt Harborside, Boston: > http://harborside.hyatt.com/property/index.jhtml > > > 3. Problem with xml:space in the Schema document for the XML namespace > > Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org> sent us email on this at: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Jul/0019 > > CONSENSUS to remove the default for xml:space from the schema > for the xml namespace. > > ACTION to Henry: Draft a new schema and send it to the XML Core list. Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0007 Henry's suggested new schema includes xml:id. Are we anticipating too much here? Henry and DV think it's fine. Norm too. We will leave it for a week and see if we have any other comments. > 4. XML errata. The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the > published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC > Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. > > Glenn has raised a question at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Sep/0080 > about the wording for the ANY and mixed content models and whether > they allow cdata sections and/or comments and PIs. > > All on the phone (and Francois in previous email) agree that we meant > to allows cdata sections and PIs and comments in these models. > > ACTION to Glenn: Propose corrected wording in email. Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0004 CONSENSUS to go with Glenn's words (with Paul's commas). > ACTION to François: Make this a PE. ACTION to Francois: Put Glenn's words into a 2 week countdown. > > 5. Namespaces in XML. > > ACTION to Richard: Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed. > > > 6. Xinclude PR was published Sept 30 at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PR-xinclude-20040930/ > and announced to the AC at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2004JulSep/0043 > > Please be sure your AC reps vote on it by October 29. > > Sandra has added ERH's test to the XInclude Test Suite. > > ACTION to Henry: Update the XInclude Test Suite with Sandra's files, > sent to us in private email headed: > > From: Sandra Martinez [mailto:sandra.martinez@nist.gov] > Sent: Thursday, 2004 September 30 12:37 > To: Paul Grosso > Cc: Henry S. Thompson > Subject: RE: XInclude Test Report > > Attached are the archive files and the report that contains > Elliotte's tests. > . . . Done per: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0008 > Elliotte has another test to send us too. ACTION to Paul: Tell Elliotte to send the files to Sandra (config file change as well as actual test files). > > 7. xml:id. > > Norm has collected the xml:id issues, now (public) at: > http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-id/wd-status/status-report.html > > ACTION to Norm: Please add $Date $ to the CVS line at the top. Done. > The latest draft (2004 August 24) is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xmlid/xml-id.html > > ID Strictness > ------------- > > We have CONSENSUS on the following: > > * Processors MUST check that xml:id values are valid NCNames. > > * It is an xml:id error for xml:id values to not be unique. > > ACTION to Norm: Produce another WG WD reflecting this and our > other decisions. ACTION continued. > No mention of [references] Infoset property > ------------------------------------------- > Conclusion: We'd like a motherhood note that suggests that > the [references] Infoset property should be correct for things > recognized by xml:id. > > xml:id and fragment identifiers > ------------------------------- > We have CONSENSUS that we don't need to say anything here. > We could add another motherhood note here. Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xml-id-20040407/ --------------------------------------------------------- CONSENSUS: xml:id only works if you don't abuse colons wrt the namespace spec. Comments on initial draft of xml:id ----------------------------------- CONSENSUS: We will soften the language about using attribute names other than xml:id as ids to be merely a suggestion to improve interoperability. ACTION to Norm: Put some new language into the next WD. When DTDs collide ----------------- xml:id will require that xml:id attr be declared as type id and if they are not declared they will be coerced to type id. If they are declared as a type other than id, that is an xml:id error; the processor must, at user option, report the error and leave the attribute typed as declared. ACTION to Norm: Point the RFC 3023-ng editors to the xml:id spec. Multiple IDs per element in schemas 1.1 --------------------------------------- The xml:id spec doesn't say anything about multiple ids per element, so this issue is up to the schema language. Missing "else" in section 4.3 ----------------------------- Norm expects to rewrite this part of the spec, so we will review this thread after the rewrite. XPath 2 without WXS (XSD) ------------------------- CONSENSUS: Nothing to do to the xml:id spec. ACTION to Henry: Urge XSL WG to consider xml:id in XPath 2.0. Feedback on XML id ------------------ Mostly editorial. Norm will address in the next WD. [QA Review] xml:id Version 1.0 ------------------------------ Norm will review these comments. > > 8. XML Profile. The TAG (via Norm) asks about progress on this: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Sep/0004 > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0001 > [7] > http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html > [8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata > [9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2004 16:07:13 UTC