- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:27:12 -0600
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- CC: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
I think that label (as defined in the list module) is similar, and we could use that as well. I did not realize that label collided with the label element in xforms. That's a bummer. Mark Birbeck wrote: > I agree with your second suggestion. The only question I have is > whether the label element from XForms could be used instead, or > whether we see caption and label as slightly different. > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: >> In my work on the XML Schema implementation, I noticed that there is a >> "caption" element in the object module that is not defined in the object >> module. Instead, it is inherited from the table module. I don't think we >> should be making the object module dependent upon the caption module, so I >> think we have two choices: >> >> 1. Define the caption element in each module (different content models, so >> no conflict even if semantics differ). >> >> 2. Define an XHTML Caption Module and have object and table point to it. >> >> I am inclined to do 2) because it is consistent with the approach we have >> taken in the past with regard to reuse. Comments? >> -- >> Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 >> Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 >> ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com >> >> >> > > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2009 17:27:51 UTC