- From: Jeff Sayre <jeff@sayremedia.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:34:33 -0700
- To: "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-xg-webid@w3.org
Good point regarding being a little more congenial toward OpenID. > On 4/20/11 4:24 PM, Henry Story wrote: >> Ok the latest version of the paper for the W3C Browser workshop has been >> put up here: >> >> http://bblfish.net/tmp/2011/04/20/ >> >> It should be an easy and clear read, and essentially make the point to >> the browser vendors that they need very little effort to make a big >> difference and solve a big problem. >> >> Henry >> >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> >> >> > Henry, > > Very nice! > > Observations re. diagram: > > 1. step #2 is missing arrow (inbound) from "resource server" to Bob's > browser is missing re. authentication challenge > 2. step #3 is missing arrow (outbound) indicating what happens after > "OK" button is clicked. > > Re. OpenID, accentuating OpenID+WebID will help i.e., implying that > OpenID implementers benefit immediately from WebID. It's less > politically thorny than implying OpenID is inadequate (even though we > know it is etc..). > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > President& CEO > OpenLink Software > Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 21:35:29 UTC