- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:47:27 +0200
- To: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Thanks for the feedback all. I have had a Manhattan to relax in the meantime though - very well served by a Parision barman who set up shop in Fontainebleau - and so, well, I am not quite in the mood to work right now on this. But there are good points which I think should be easy to solve with a few minor adjustments. I'll do that tomorrow. Henry On 20 Apr 2011, at 23:34, Jeff Sayre wrote: > Good point regarding being a little more congenial toward OpenID. > >> On 4/20/11 4:24 PM, Henry Story wrote: >>> Ok the latest version of the paper for the W3C Browser workshop has been >>> put up here: >>> >>> http://bblfish.net/tmp/2011/04/20/ >>> >>> It should be an easy and clear read, and essentially make the point to >>> the browser vendors that they need very little effort to make a big >>> difference and solve a big problem. >>> >>> Henry >>> >>> Social Web Architect >>> http://bblfish.net/ >>> >>> >>> >> Henry, >> >> Very nice! >> >> Observations re. diagram: >> >> 1. step #2 is missing arrow (inbound) from "resource server" to Bob's >> browser is missing re. authentication challenge >> 2. step #3 is missing arrow (outbound) indicating what happens after >> "OK" button is clicked. >> >> Re. OpenID, accentuating OpenID+WebID will help i.e., implying that >> OpenID implementers benefit immediately from WebID. It's less >> politically thorny than implying OpenID is inadequate (even though we >> know it is etc..). >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Kingsley Idehen >> President& CEO >> OpenLink Software >> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 21:47:58 UTC