- From: Kashyap, Vipul <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 08:07:03 -0400
- To: <gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr>, "Kathryn Blackmond Laskey" <klaskey@gmu.edu>, <mkokar@ece.neu.edu>
- Cc: <public-xg-urw3@w3.org>
> If you suggest to have discussions over mail and then summarize our points
> on
> the wiki it is fine by me.
> But if you suggest only to summarize on the wikis then I still see a
> problem.
> Take for example the current wiki page on the uncertainty ontology. It
> contains (only) 4 items. But, it is not very easy to track who inserted
> these
> items. To which item, item number X replies? Currently only 2 people have
> entered their points and we have 4 items. Imagine 10. And imagine these 10
> to
> reply to points of other persons.
[VK] I think we agree!
One small suggestion is that when we summarize our points on the wiki,
we annotate it with our names or something.
---Vipul
The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Received on Sunday, 17 June 2007 12:10:29 UTC