- From: <gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 07:17:06 -0000
- To: "Kashyap@image.ece.ntua.gr, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>, Giorgos Stoilos <gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr>, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey <klaskey@gmu.edu>, mkokar@ece.neu.edu
- Cc: public-xg-urw3@w3.org
"Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG> said: > > > > > I would propose that instead of cluttering people's e-mail, we should > > add > > > our > > > comments directly on the wiki page.. > > > > > > This will be the best way to exchange ideas. The biggest advantage being > > > that if > > > someone else has already said something similar, you can do +1 to it... > > > > > > > I do not agree with this. Imagine 7+ people discussing about the same > > thing, > > replying or commenting to the argument of other people etc, replying on > > replies and all these say for a weak. This would be a nightmare to have > > and > > manage on the wiki. It could easily create something that after some time > > is > > unreadable. An archived (and threaded) mailing list is the way things are > > going on, on every W3C activity so far some of which are far larger than > > this one (20+ people). > > [VK] I did not mean to imply this... > > > On the other hand we can put summaries of our discussion or concrete > > results > > on the wiki. > > [VK] What I was suggesting was exactly this... That we could summarize our > objections in a few lines with associated examples instead of lengthy > discussions. > > ---Vipul If you suggest to have discussions over mail and then summarize our points on the wiki it is fine by me. But if you suggest only to summarize on the wikis then I still see a problem. Take for example the current wiki page on the uncertainty ontology. It contains (only) 4 items. But, it is not very easy to track who inserted these items. To which item, item number X replies? Currently only 2 people have entered their points and we have 4 items. Imagine 10. And imagine these 10 to reply to points of other persons. Anyway, I have made my point and I will stop bothering the list further. Greetings, -gstoil > > > > > > The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information. > > > --
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2007 07:17:21 UTC