- From: Kathryn Blackmond Laskey <klaskey@gmu.edu>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:05:32 -0400
- To: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>, gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey <klaskey@gmu.edu>, mkokar@ece.neu.edu
- Cc: public-xg-urw3@w3.org
I think we want the ontology page itself and a discussion page. The discussion page can contain dialogue (think of the "talk" pages on wikipedia); the ontology page would be more like an organized description of the ontology. K At 8:07 AM -0400 6/17/07, Kashyap, Vipul wrote: > > If you suggest to have discussions over mail and then summarize our points >> on >> the wiki it is fine by me. >> But if you suggest only to summarize on the wikis then I still see a >> problem. >> Take for example the current wiki page on the uncertainty ontology. It >> contains (only) 4 items. But, it is not very easy to track who inserted >> these >> items. To which item, item number X replies? Currently only 2 people have >> entered their points and we have 4 items. Imagine 10. And imagine these 10 >> to >> reply to points of other persons. > >[VK] I think we agree! > One small suggestion is that when we summarize our points on the wiki, > we annotate it with our names or something. > >---Vipul > > > > > >The information transmitted in this electronic communication is >intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and >may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, >retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any >action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities >other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received >this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at >800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Received on Sunday, 17 June 2007 16:04:02 UTC