Re: [MMSEM-UC] Review of Tagging Use Case / Agenda 28 September Telecon 1600 UTC

Dear all

I would like to thank everyone who has contributed to the review of the
Tagging UC. I think both the discussion as well as the method/structure of
this UC review, being the first one to be examined, will also benefit the
rest of the UCs.

In regards to main the main criticism of the Tagging UC, its relevance to
the MMSem XG, it stimulated us to engage in a discussion as to how we
should proceed. Our conclusion was that although the issues described in
the UC are per se valid, they are indeed not so much MM-related issues -
at least in the way presented currently.

Therefore, we intend to concentrate our efforts on the Syntactic
interoperability issue. We intend to provide soon a more concrete example
as to how this could be solved. We do not exclude however the option to
add more issues at a later stage, should that become possible.

Finally, i wonder if we should maybe cancel today's teleconf, since it
seems  that a lot of the participants, including the chairs, will not be
able to join..

Regards

--
George Anadiotis
PhD Researcher
CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
e-mail: george.anadiotis@cwi.nl
Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4080
Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
Web: http://www.cwi.nl/ins2/
>
> Dear Michael and Stamatia,
>
>> Referring to AP [1], I now made my comments available at [2].
>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/09/14-mmsem-minutes.html#action10
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/wiki/Tagging_Use_Case_Review
>
> Thanks for having proposed a template for commenting the use cases and
for
> having
> completed your APs and sorry for not having reacted before.
> I have found your comments completely relevant for this particular use
case and I share
> them. However, I will object that the review remains at a too high level
for being fully
> useful to the authors. More generally, do not hesitate to propose new
wording of
> paragraphs or sections that sounds for you obscure, or propose new
research directions,
> etc ...
> Remember that this is not a review of a scientific paper, do not be
"politically correct"
> but on the contrary, be tough and constructive in your comments ... We
will be with your
> use case :-)
>
> I should have pointed that before, but some good examples of tough
review
> are available
> for the "Image Annotation on the Semantic Web" document at [3,4,5,6,7]
and
> to some extent
> [8 .. 14].
>
> Best regards.
>
>     RaphaŽl
>
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0020.html
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0023.html
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0088.html
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0089.html
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0093.html
>
> [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Apr/0032.html
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Apr/0033.html
[10]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Apr/0034.html
[11]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Apr/0037.html
> [12]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Apr/0035.html
> [13]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Apr/0036.html
> [14]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Apr/0038.html
>
> --
> RaphaŽl Troncy
> CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
> Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
> Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
> Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 28 September 2006 07:33:34 UTC