Re: Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA)

So far, RDA does *not* appear earlier in the report. So I've revised this to use the (JSC), but left the somewhat incorrect title:
 Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (JSC)

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_page_take2&diff=6353&oldid=6339

There's no obvious place to insert a reference to RDA earlier, but perhaps you're more clever than I am on that!

:) -Jodi


On 9 Sep 2011, at 19:48, Karen Coyle wrote:

> I was hoping that RDA would be de-acronymed earlier in the report. It's quite awkward to do it here. The name the group gives itself is
> 
> "Joint Steering Committee for the Development of RDA". I think we can give that followed by "(JSC)", and assume we'll spell out RDA elsewhere.
> 
> kc
> 
> Quoting Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>:
> 
>> I was a little confused to see RDA rather than JSC here for the Joint Steering Committee. Is that intentional? I remember that we'd discussed spelling out RDA itself...
>> 
>> -Jodi
>> 
>> Standardization in the library world is often undertaken by bodies focused exclusively on the library domain, such as the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) or the Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA).
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
> 
>