- From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 18:01:45 +0200
- To: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Cc: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org> wrote: > > On 7 Sep 2011, at 16:46, Emmanuelle Bermes wrote: >> >> It seems to me that we could be more specific regarding the kind of >> "more deep integration" of library data with the Web that we expect : >> links, and not only APIs or search interfaces (either for humans or >> machines). >> >> I tried a change to reflect that, diff at >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_page_take2&diff=6291&oldid=6247 >> >> BEFORE : >> "Library data today resides in databases which, while they may have >> Web-facing search interfaces, are not more deeply integrated with >> other data sources on the Web." >> >> AFTER : >> "Library data today resides in databases which are only accessible on >> the Web through search interfaces, and not through links with other >> data sources on the Web." > > > +1 > > If we want to expand further on this theme, the lack of permalinks could be mentioned. It may not be utterly clear that lacking links and lacking *linkability* are both implied here. > how about ""Library data today resides in databases which are only accessible on the Web through search interfaces, and not through PERSISTENT links with other data sources on the Web." ?
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 16:02:13 UTC