Re: Editing "Issues"

On 7 Sep 2011, at 17:01, Emmanuelle Bermes wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On 7 Sep 2011, at 16:46, Emmanuelle Bermes wrote:
>>> 
>>> It seems to me that we could be more specific regarding the kind of
>>> "more deep integration" of library data with the Web that we expect :
>>> links, and not only APIs or search interfaces (either for humans or
>>> machines).
>>> 
>>> I tried a change to reflect that, diff at
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_page_take2&diff=6291&oldid=6247
>>> 
>>> BEFORE :
>>> "Library data today resides in databases which, while they may have
>>> Web-facing search interfaces, are not more deeply integrated with
>>> other data sources on the Web."
>>> 
>>> AFTER :
>>> "Library data today resides in databases which are only accessible on
>>> the Web through search interfaces, and not through links with other
>>> data sources on the Web."
>> 
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> If we want to expand further on this theme, the lack of permalinks could be mentioned. It may not be utterly clear that lacking links and lacking *linkability* are both implied here.
>> 
> 
> how about
> 
> ""Library data today resides in databases which are only accessible on
> the Web through search interfaces, and not through PERSISTENT links with other
> data sources on the Web."
> 
> ?

DONE as
Library data today resides in databases which are only accessible on the Web through search interfaces, and not through persistent links to and from other data sources on the Web.

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_page_take2&diff=6292&oldid=6291

"to and from" isn't quite right -- but it emphasizes that we can't link into these sources. (I'd be ok with just "to", but I don't think that gets the sense of what's there).

-Jodi